# Amazon RDS Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra

> Is Amazon RDS the right Database solution for you? Explore 218 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice.

Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/192201/Amazon-RDS/reviews

---

Amazon RDS

4.7 (218)

[View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/192201/Amazon-RDS/alternatives/)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated March 25th, 2026

# Reviews of Amazon RDS

Ease of use

4.4

Customer Service

4.4

## Pros and Cons in Reviews

Manish T

Software EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“One of the best thing about it is that no configuration & setup required in order to work with any database, it could be relational or non relational DB eg: MySQL, MongoDB, SQL or Oracle anything with just few clicks on aws console we can start working.“

February 13, 2025

Prateek G

Senior Software EngineerComputer Software, 501 - 1,000 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“there is not a great way to enable encryption if you started of with an unencrypted database.“

January 7, 2026

Monica G

Cloud EngineerTelecommunications, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“The multiple writers for Aurora is helpful to latency for global traffic.“

June 9, 2025

RR

Richard R

IT Support AnalystReal Estate, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years.

“On the odd occasion, we have had trouble diagnosing a performance issue, and access/management control.“

May 30, 2025

Muhammad Aamer K

Full stack software developerReal Estate, Self-employedUsed the software for: Less than 6 months.

“I like some of the things the most about amazon RDS no 1 obviously the pricing it is amazing you only get charged for your usage and then secondly the remote connection although it is not very easy but when you establish it like for example with your microsoft workbench then there is nothing better than Amazon RDS and then there is more good things for example this is very very secure and fast and reliable“

November 29, 2023

an

alessandro n

administratorMedical Practice, Self-employedUsed the software for: I used a free trial.

“some problems occoured in our management software while using program“

April 18, 2024

RJ

Rehan J

Software EngineerComputer Software, 201 - 500 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years.

“It automatically backs up data and we can restore our data even if we lost it.“

May 26, 2023

SN

Samuel N

IT manager Computer Software, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years.

“Affected by system crashes which May result in data loss“

May 10, 2023

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 1-25 of 218 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

Prateek G.  
Senior Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "One of the best managed services for Postgres"

January 7, 2026

4.0

Overall the experience has been wonderful with RDS. Given that it's managed service it serves you really well with High Availability, Disaster recovery, Replication The Blue green deployment is also a really good feature for testing out schema related or major version changes. This was really helpful when moving away from Older versions of Postgres for larger DBs Reserved Instances is another option you can use to save some dollars if you know about your workloads

Pros

I've mainly used Amazon RDS for Postgres so can't speak for other database engines. For Postgres the most liked thing about RDS is how quickly they make the major versions available. You don't have to wait too long to try out latest Postgres updates when you are with RDS

Cons

Couple of drawbacks with RDS I've seen over the years - there is not a great way to enable encryption if you started of with an unencrypted database. You need to create a new database and migrate all your data - same applies for reducing storage of the database, you can increase the storage but cannot lower the storage - columnar extensions are not made available on RDS -

Review Source

RR

Richard R.  
IT Support Analyst  
Real Estate  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Simple solution to rapidly implement new platforms"

May 30, 2025

5.0

Overall, a simple way to start testing/piloting new applications with minimal support required. Ease of use, access, and speed to deploy. We also had issues migrating out of AWS due to a supplier changing platforms, we needed to migrate to MS Azure.

Pros

Ease of setup. Configuration and out-of-the-box setups allowed for the rapid testing and then replication and rollout across the business. Reduction in management tasks such as, automation of tasks, provisioning, patching, backups and Recovery. Failover with alerts to a reporting platform ensures issues are dealt with in a timely manner.

Cons

On the odd occasion, we have had trouble diagnosing a performance issue, and access/management control. In particular, Lack of OS and Database Root Access. While RDS supports popular database engines (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle, MariaDB), the way AWS manages them introduces some proprietary elements.

Switched from

[Microsoft 365](https://www.capterra.com/p/227157/Microsoft-365/)

More ease of use, better setupand suppliers recommended

Review Source

Aleksandr S.  
Principal software engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Will cost you all yourmoney."

April 7, 2021

3.0

Easy to setup. Very expensive. Play great with other AWS services. The main issue is that metrics collected manually will never meet AWS metrics which are used to bill your stack. And of course AWS point of view will be much costly. Their Enterprise Support can not understand why metrics extracted from DB itself do not meet billing metrics and will endlessly redirect you to yet another expert.

Pros

Requires minimum knowledge or time to set up the database. Everything you need is basically there. Documentation is fantastic. It just works and takes all the burden of infrastructure management from you. A handful of engines, version, and extensions to them are supprted. Integrated seamless to AWS infrastructure.

Cons

Price. It will literally eat 7/8 of your infrastructure budget. Metrics lies. Performance insight simply does not work. Note, this is an opinion of somebody who paid for AWS Enterprise support (sigh, that's me) Backups are not backups per se, this is filesystem rsync. So it is easy to end up with broken DB. Support is very poor.

Alternatives considered

[Google Cloud](https://www.capterra.com/p/268690/Google-Cloud-Platform/)

Reason for choosing Amazon RDS

We already had few services deployed to AWS. This is the sole reason.

Switched from

[Google Cloud](https://www.capterra.com/p/268690/Google-Cloud-Platform/)

RDS looked very promising. It still is except that you have no control over the bill.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Lead Engineer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Overall Good Experience"

February 20, 2025

5.0

Pros

RDS giving lot of features with better performance.

Cons

Doing setup become little bit difficult.

Switched from

[MySQL](https://www.capterra.com/p/11482/MySQL/)

They are not providing that much features so i switch.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Intern  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Scalable & Reliable But Hard To Configure"

March 7, 2025

4.0

It provides seamless database management but limited control over configurations.

Pros

It supports multiple database engines like PostgreSQL, Aurora, and MySQL

Cons

It is costly for high performance workloads and complex while setting up in multi AZ deployments.

Switched from

[MongoDB](https://www.capterra.com/p/127374/MongoDB/)[MySQL](https://www.capterra.com/p/11482/MySQL/)

I made switch because Amazon RDS provides scalability, automation and easy backups.

Review Source

Ana A.  
Security Architecture Discipline leader  
Banking  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "High availability even for database beginners"

July 18, 2022

4.0

I am using it as a MySQL server. With a managed database server, almost everything can be configured by just operating the configuration screen, so it is recommended that even members with little knowledge of MySQL can create a high availability database infrastructure, such as creating a Master-Slave configuration. It was possible to significantly reduce the man-hours required to install and configure the DB supports in EC2 and the upgrade procedure for maintenance, and dedicate the man-hours to other design and construction work. Including a BD license, it has freed us from license management. In addition, by not needing a physical space, we are freed from the whole flow of purchasing it.

Pros

It is a pay-per-use system where you are only charged for the number of transactions that occur. Still, there is also a subscription system called Reserved Instances (RI), so instances that generate transactions frequently use this system to reduce costs significantly. There are three types to choose from: one-year prepayment, one-year prepayment, monthly payment, and no prepayment, depending on the kind of discount. Pay-per-use is basically cheaper for cases where transactions do not occur frequently, depending on the situation, so you can optimize the charge by using different payment methods depending on the application.

Cons

I would like you to provide a concrete fault test solution. If you do not have a high level of knowledge about RDS, you cannot be relieved that you cannot perform useful failure tests assuming a failure occurs.

Alternatives considered

[Quickbase](https://www.capterra.com/p/157262/QuickBase/)

Reason for choosing Amazon RDS

It is necessary to stop updating the specifications, but it is easy and simple to update.

Switched from

[PostgreSQL](https://www.capterra.com/p/48791/PostgreSQL/)

I migrated to RDS from a database server with MySQL installed on a LINUX server. When creating a master-slave configuration, it was necessary to configure MySQL for two servers, but with the switch to RDS, only a few clicks are needed. In addition, the Availability Zone automatically becomes redundant, which makes it easier to manage.

Review Source

David W.  
Head of Engineering  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "High quality, bulletproof managed database service"

April 20, 2022

4.0

We use Amazon RDS to manage our key production/transactional databases for our customer-facing applications as well as our development environment, internal ERP, etc. We definitely gain value and efficiency from not having to deal with the management of yet another server - and its operating system, patches, uptime, etc. - it is a real boon to simply have a database-as-a-service that we spin up, connect to, and work with, letting AWS deal with all the management.

Pros

AWS RDS allows us to deploy databases easily and efficiently with great resilience, scalability, and security - but without having to deal with managing a server. RDS makes it easy to spin up a new database, have multi-availability zone replicas, back it up, and do many other things. It's also dead easy to upgrade software versions - simply let AWS look after it.

Cons

Being a managed database service there are restrictions; for instance, with SQL Server you don't have the sysadmin role and you can't set any trace flag you want. You can adjust a number of parameters in the RDS console but only those which AWS have explicitly added support for. There are other caveats and restrictions for other DBMS products too. Another thing I don't like is when you change your instance size it takes a long time - but at least there's no downtime. Also, tooling is restricted. A lot of great tools to dig into performance and query tracing won't work with the AWS caveats so you have to use the AWS RDS console and logs and it can be more tedious to really drill into application performance bottlenecks.

Alternatives considered

[Microsoft Azure](https://www.capterra.com/p/16365/Azure/)

Reason for choosing Amazon RDS

Ultimately, despite being a Microsoft environment historically, our developers felt AWS provided superior tooling and functionality.

Switched from

[Microsoft SQL Server](https://www.capterra.com/p/1417/SQL-Server/)

We wanted to move from on-premises to the cloud.

Review Source

MAN

Muhammad Arsalan N.  
Principal DevOps Engineer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "AWS RDS Review"

June 10, 2019

4.0

My company need a simple and fast scalable solution for managing MySQL databases therefore we chose RDS. Prior to RDS we were managing DB clusters installed on VMs on Hyper Visors, and it was a cumbersome job. Though switching to RDS does make our life easy but RDS is not a cheap solution though.

Pros

Easily Scalable as per need. AWS manage you infrastructure completely. Fast Disaster recovery if planned the architecture correctly. Multi AZ deployment and Read replica supported. Supported various DB services like MySQL, Oracle, SQL Server and Postgres. Backup procedure is very easy.

Cons

Cost on higher side. Lack of control on your DB instance, though it's good but at times you need some tweaking todo.

Switched from

[MySQL](https://www.capterra.com/p/11482/MySQL/)

It was convenient for us to host DB on RDS than to managing a cluster.

Review Source

Monica G.  
Cloud Engineer  
Telecommunications  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Reliable, reliable, I/O cost are pricey, Aurora write forwarding is neat"

June 9, 2025

4.0

Overall, reliable RDS service. I wish the I/O costs were a little more affordable. I really like Aurora write forwarding feature.

Pros

I use mostly RDS MySQL, RDS Postgresql, and RDS Aurora services. The multiple writers for Aurora is helpful to latency for global traffic. The service is reliable. I've only had 1 issue in the past 6 years with RDS.

Cons

I wish the service was cheaper, especially Aurora. The I/O charges are killer. Other than that, it is a good relational database service.

Review Source

SB

Swaibu B.  
AWS Solution Architecture  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Amazon RDS"

February 10, 2025

5.0

Amazon RDS is a reliable and convenient managed database service. It is great for automation and scaling, but it lacks deep customization and fine-tuned control.

Pros

Amazon RDS simplifies database management with automated backups, scaling, and maintenance, reducing operational overhead.

Cons

Compared to self-managed databases, there is limited customization and control, especially for configurations and performance tuning.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Engineer  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Simple, Reliable, and Ready-to-Use Database Solution"

February 13, 2025

4.0

Pros

One of the best thing about it is that no configuration & setup required in order to work with any database, it could be relational or non relational DB eg: MySQL, MongoDB, SQL or Oracle anything with just few clicks on aws console we can start working.

Cons

There are no major issue but pricing model comparison to on premise setup is costly & cluster updates sometimes delay the business operation & any production deployment.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Co-Founder & CTO  
E-Learning  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "RDS is just a necessity"

August 10, 2023

4.0

Pros

Provides all the basic features that we absolutely need, out of the box. Super helpful

Cons

Since it's an AWS service, it's just not very intuitive to get around with - just like any other AWS products.

Reason for choosing Amazon RDS

We had credits with AWS - so we just went ahead with the most used managed-RDBMS service.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Sr. System/Network administrator  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Setting up a "serversless" database environment inminutes"

February 13, 2019

4.0

Since we start using RDS it saves us a lot of time. You can start with a small instance and very easily grow to a larger instance and a multi AZ (High available) setup. No need to worry about disk space anymore for backups or snapshots. Amazon doesn't run out of space. You can setup automated backup with a retention of 35 days max but if you need to keep backups longer you can create manual snapshots and keep them forever.

Pros

\- Very easy to setup - Creating database environments including HA in minutes - Creating a HA environment without having to know anything about database replication - Upgrading the DB engine with a click of a mouse - Very ease to create backups (and setup automated snapshots) - Easy to restore - Can be managed via the weg GUI but also via the very powerful AWS CLI - No need to manage an Operating system - Changing instanced types if you need more or less CPU/memory. - Dynamically change the storage - Performance is very good

Cons

\- On Aurora the disk spaces grows automatically when the database grows. But when deleting lots of data its not possible to shrink the file system. - No root access to server (which we never missed since using RDS)

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior Software Engineer  
Retail  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Amazon RDS - Keeping it simple & easy"

January 18, 2019

4.0

Overall very satisfied. It worked for our use case.

Pros

Easy to setup and running. All cloudwatch metrics made available like other AWS services. Ability to take snapshots, scale up horizontally and vertically across environments and depending upon load. We were able to automate our build and deployments using terraform scripts. Automated Backups are stored in S3 so you can retrieve backups when needed. Pay as you go like traditional EC2 metered cost model. You can predict your montly/yearly estimates before hand. It just works! Supports a wide range of DB's - PostgreSQL, MySQL, MSSQL, etc.

Cons

Security setup may take time as its controlled by security groups. So it takes time to troubleshoot if you are not able to connect from local or any other remote instance. Pricing may start to increase when you upgrade your instance types and add replication nodes etc.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Great Database option for the cloud if you want fine-grained instance management"

May 14, 2020

4.0

Overall Amazon RDS has been a very good solution in our switch to the cloud. Other options have come out that may be better for most people, such as Amazon Aurora, but it's great for fine-grained control over instances.

Pros

Amazon RDS has worked really well for us for our cloud DB solution. It's pretty intuitive and easy to use, and you can choose exactly what instances sizes, storage sizes, etc. you want.

Cons

Amazon RDS has a strange method for determining how many IOPS you get (Input/Output Operations per Second): it's based mostly on your db storage size. So if you have a smaller database that is hit a lot, you can get throttled with the IOPS. But if you have a large database that isn't hit as often, you end up having a lot of unused IOPS.

Review Source

RJ

Rehan J.  
Software Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Well performing database"

May 26, 2023

5.0

Pros

RDS is a highly scalable database and it can scale up or down depending on the resource and workloads it has and it works smoothly even for high data volumes and increased traffic. It automatically backs up data and we can restore our data even if we lost it. This is a highly available db because it automatically stores data in another availability zone and if a failure happens, then the primary database will be replaced with that replica.

Cons

With our application requirement, we have to choose the supported db engine. That db engine running inside RDS has some limitations other than running it in our machine. So that is the drawback I see.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Architekt rozwiza IT - Departament Rozwoju Infrastruktury  
  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Easiest database management there is"

June 13, 2018

5.0

Peace of mind if it's about database administration, backup and availability.

Pros

It's fully managed database service with multiple database types available (Amazon Aurora, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server) - you can chose whatever you like or used to run. It's really easy to migrate from existing database of the same type. RDS is highly available and durable service if you chose to run in multi AZ (multiple availability zone/datacenter) scenario (master/slave replication). Amazon will do all the administration task like upgrades or failover for you. Max database storage size is 16 TB (in most cases) and you pay only for what you use.

Cons

It'a a little pricey and not all advance database configuration/administratio options are available if you compare it to on premise deployment.

Review Source

Menka T.  
Software engineer analyst  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Amazon RDS review"

January 26, 2024

5.0

Pros

Amazon RDS is easy to use .It helps to maintain the relational database in the cloud.Also it’s flexible and secure to use.

Cons

It has higher cost compared to other softwares.And also we can only increase the allocated storage in Amazon RDS we can’t reduce it.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior Software Developer  
Printing  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Database service that allows you to scale easily and quickly"

October 3, 2019

5.0

Very good. Started using it when we were a small startup and it allowed us to easily scale to a full grown portal.

Pros

A lot of server tiers available to choose from, good when you need to start out with a smaller instance. Like to option to quickly create snapshots or restore a backup. Multi-az is a nice freaute to have that can save your business when things go south.

Cons

Halted instances are booted back up after 7 days automatically, so you can't really have an instance that is stopped for a long time. Since it's not a self-hosted service, there are some low level features that are missing.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software engineer intern  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "No need of building own infrastucture, use RDS and save time ,money. Rapid development"

July 16, 2019

5.0

Pros

AWS is the reason, amazon is giant today and RDS is one of the most used services on AWS. No need of maintaining own infrastructure, server, backup plans. Use RDS, they have everything ready for you, create RDS instances , as much as you required, scale if you need more resources, use RDS backup plans to backup all your data and retrieve whenever required. with 99.999% availability and highly secured features, your application development will be much better.

Cons

security features need to be taken care seriously

Review Source

Ashish K.  
Software Developer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Amazon Web Services are the Best!"

August 10, 2019

5.0

Pros

It caters to all types of requirements in terms of size, it can handle any amount of data The pricing is good and even a person starting out his website or server can use this to maintain 100% uptime of his database. You can control a lot of things from the Control Panel of AWS which include monitoring CPU usage, number of connections. It provides easy rebooting as well.

Cons

There was nothing that I did not like about this software. I am still using it and it solves my use case perfectly.

Review Source

Manny P.  
.  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Easy way to put DB in the cloud"

September 24, 2018

5.0

Amazon is changing the way we do things and how our database reaches others. It's only a matter of time before our entire infrastructure is on the cloud.

Pros

Amazon is getting good at putting DB in the cloud that before you know it, it will be as easy and syncing data to another computer. Amazon is in the right track and not for long other companies will follow and make their disaster recovery simple to do.

Cons

Amazon still has a long way to go to make every database work seamless, but they have the right idea and concepts and it will only be a matter of time. The pricing is something to get use to until it goes down and the demand get larger.

Review Source

Ramses Miguel P.  
English Language professor  
Education Management  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "The cloud is here"

November 12, 2021

5.0

In general, this software is really good and efficient, you could do many things and your information is safe.

Pros

I really like this software and I would sincerally recommend it. It is simple, practical and easy to use.

Cons

I think the only thing that I don't quite like is the cost. I think it is a little expensive.

Review Source

Luis Felipe A.  
Programmer  
Internet  
Used the software for: 2+ years

### "Great performance and fast support"

December 3, 2019

5.0

We have been using RDS for about 6 years, we have just a few issues (with always a fast response/solution)

Pros

\- Great stability and performance - Great technical support - You almost don't need to mind at any configuration or database servers anymore

Cons

Maybe the costs, but it depends. For small databases the RDS may not be a good idea but for large ones, you'll probably spend less than maintaining you own infrastructure

Review Source

AG

Andrew G.  
Software Engineer  
Insurance  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "Prefer Mongo or DocumentDB but if I must use an RDBMS"

September 6, 2022

4.0

Deployed SQLserver to RDS on AWS

Pros

Easy deployments and ability to run in AWS

Cons

Non RDBMS are the future. I always prefer DocumentDB or Mongo if possible

Switched from

[Microsoft SQL Server](https://www.capterra.com/p/1417/SQL-Server/)

Cloud

Review Source

Similar Products

Featured