# Page 3 | mabl Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra

> Page 3 - Is mabl the right Automated Testing solution for you? Explore 67 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice.

Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/175029/mabl/reviews

---

mabl

4 (67)

[View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/175029/mabl/alternatives/)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated March 13th, 2026

# Page 3 - Reviews of mabl

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 51-67 of 67 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software QA Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Mabl has been efficient at creating quick UI testing flows that would otherwise take hours to code"

May 3, 2018

3.0

Saved so much time by not writing Selenium code.

Pros

I like the learning aspect of Mabl. The fact that I do not have to update where a button moved on a homepage for example, is the key to this software.

Cons

I do not like the fact that I cannot test on all browsers. I believe that the point of UI testing is to make sure that everyone has a good experience on your site, no matter the user's browser.

Review Source

CS

Chris S.  
CTO  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Still early days"

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

Pricing is on demand and is based on actual usage. This is good as we're a startup and we haven't starting building our product yet.

Cons

Too early today.We are still designing product and will have a better opinion once we start building

Review Source

NW

Nathan W.  
Sales Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "I found MABL to be a solid ML based testing tool - set up basic test/checks."

May 3, 2018

3.0

Automated testing with very little configuration, out of the box validations, lots of depth and customization options.

Pros

The automatic execution is nice - not having to set up triggers and timers manually is appreciated. The ML aspect is interesting, and hopefully I can dig into this a little more in the near future. I would like to use this for service testing as well as UI based scripts.

Cons

Nothing so far, all worked well! I would like to dig into the validation rules a little bit more and see what depth of testing is supported, as well as options for custom scripts (import Cucumber script etc.)

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
QA Manager  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "good starting point for UI automation but record and playback does not work correctly"

May 3, 2018

3.0

AI automation is a thing now but its far from useful

Pros

I like the naming convention of the journey etc. I like the actual step by step activities. the broken links are helpful.

Cons

for UI automation purposes it does not record correctly. Replay on first try does not work. Do not know how to fix the replay when it is broken, No easy way to fix the broken test.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Junior Software Engineer in Test  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Easy to use. The UX could be better. The app felt like it wasn't 100% complete yet."

May 6, 2018

3.0

Pros

It is very easy to configure new tests. The app is easily integrated with JIRA. It is also simple to add new apps to test.

Cons

In the dashboard, the recent test results sometimes take a while to load. In the 'plans' tab the triggers limit is reached only after adding a post-deployment trigger.

Review Source

SS

Saranya S.  
Manager  
Computer Software  
Used the software for:

### "Mabl is pretty good tool for automation testers. Auto Heal is an awesome functionality. "

May 9, 2018

4.0

Ease of use.

Pros

Auto Heal API Call to trigger execution Journey creation - simple and easy Test Execution triggers Broken link validation

Cons

Tool could have provisions to create user specific actions. There is no support to have the scripts pushed to version control System

Review Source

eK

eran K.  
Director and evangelist  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Great emerging product for automated web testing"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

Easy to start with, extensive test data automatically generated and re-executed daily or upon schedule

Cons

Only web and not mobile support is the most important gap to close Immediate support for latest Os platforms is also a question

Review Source

MS

Matthew S.  
Test Automation Specialist  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "An innovative product with a the right direction"

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

It's intutive, easy to implement and affordable. In comparison to competitors, I love the auto-healing feature that solves simple regression changes.

Cons

Occasionally, the UI for building a journey can be clunky which has resulted in having to recreate an entire journey - especially not being able to edit a journey from a certain point or step backwards. Implentation of 'flows' has eased this process.

Review Source

AO

Anca O.  
QA Manager  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Promising tool, I'm glad I found it."

May 4, 2018

4.0

Pros

Easy to setup and to record tests, friendly UI, easy to learn by non-technical members, provides reports, integrates with Jenkins, no coding skills needed

Cons

"Find element" feature could be improved, I'd like to be able to run tests sequentially when I add multiple journeys to a plan, I'd like to be able to edit a step more easily (without playing and stopping to the step, or having to remove others)

Review Source

NV

Nemanja V.  
UI/UX designer  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Great tool for developers!"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

Simplicity and easy to work with. The UI for mable is just great. I had no problems to setup any of the journeys and testing works just perfect. This is a must-have tool for every developer.

Cons

So far so nothing. A interface could be something to be worked on, but that's not important at this stage

Review Source

sM

sumit M.  
QA Manager  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Started well but became fickle as complexity increased. Not much AI on assertions. "

May 3, 2018

3.0

Pros

Easy setup. User simulation. CI integration. Some auto validations. Customizable journey. Easy to include at UI web development stage

Cons

Complex assertions setup. Not enough beyond dom. Hard to capture html containers without don. Integration of rest and UI. Reporting not customizable

Review Source

DL

David L.  
QA Automation Engineer  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Simple and easy to use"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

The UI was straight forward and ready to understand. Overall the instructions provided great use cases and were easy to set up.

Cons

Limitations when it came to testing production and development environments. The emails became a bit spamming and weren't useful.

Review Source

LH

Linda H.  
Acting QA Manager  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Super nice company, quick feedback/support and fast delivery of new requested features"

May 4, 2018

4.0

Pros

That we can use it for our tests in an easy way. It's easy to start with and it's dosen't require any licenses or other software.

Cons

It doesn't has all the feature we need yet :) Sometimes is not so straight forward to know how to do the things we like to do.

Review Source

PR

Paul R.  
Owner  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Not immediately obvious. Didnt have the most immediate features I was looking for"

May 3, 2018

3.0

Not a ton.

Pros

Concept was nice, using machine learning to transform most tedious part of my job. I appreciate the idea.

Cons

Not super easy to set up. Represented pretty big time investment. Couldnt test apis only html pages

Review Source

SB

Scott B.  
CTO  
E-Learning  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "It was super simple to set up and it was very intuitive"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Simplicity in testing that is unmatched anywhere else.

Pros

The ability to set up end to end tests simply by browsing your website. The chrome extension made it so easy to set up comprehensive tests, and this is coming from someone who was always too intimidated to set up end to end tests before.

Cons

Sometimes it is hard to select and monitor a specific element. It would be nice to monitor for css class changes or attribute changes to an element.

Review Source

MG

Maria G.  
student  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Hard to use, it wasn't very clear what the functions were just by reading the names of the sections."

May 4, 2018

3.0

Pros

the "click on al pages" and "login and visit home page" features, and the fact that you can program the times mabl will run the jouneys (like once a day or every certain amount of hours) and that you can visualize the output

Cons

the labeling of the functions, how the results were presented, it was very hard to understand for someone that is starting a qa tester career

Review Source

NM

Neil M.  
Tech Lead  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "So far so good"

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

Easy to setup, results are clear and easy to understand, easy to update, reliable so far with the test schedules,

Cons

Limited features, user journeys could be setup more automatically. More details around loading times.

Review Source

Similar Products

Featured