# Page 2 | mabl Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra

> Page 2 - Is mabl the right Automated Testing solution for you? Explore 67 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice.

Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/175029/mabl/reviews

---

mabl

4 (67)

[View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/175029/mabl/alternatives/)

Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/)

* * *

Last updated March 13th, 2026

# Page 2 - Reviews of mabl

## Showing most helpful reviews

Showing 26-50 of 67 Reviews

Sort by:

Most Helpful

Rating

Company Size

Reviewer's Role

Length of Use

Frequency of Use

AW

Andrea W.  
Director of Engineering  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Finally, a tool that lives up to the hype and its ability to reduce automation maintenance overhead!"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Easy to use.

Pros

Overall, mabl is enabling our QA team to keep up with the product delivery pace of our dev and devops teams in the world of CI/CD (continuous integration/delivery). With the mabl trainer browser plug-in we are able to set up functional tests against our web application in minutes. Later, if we want to modify or enhance the tests, it's easy to make changes. Test capabilities are robust, including the ability to use javascript within the test. mabl is providing actionable insights about how the application is behaving, and we can see trends in failures or performance. We also like the image comparison capability which allows us to 'see' quickly why a test might have failed. New features are delivered at a rapid pace.

Cons

There are still some tests we can not port into mabl due to reliance on external systems (the ability to reach out from the system and affect an event outside of our application). For example, verify the receipt and contents of an email sent FROM our web application out to a test recipient inbox. We've given feedback to mabl to get our desired features onto the roadmap.

Review Source

JK

Jhanvi K.  
Team Leader  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Automated Testing and Deployment Platform"

February 11, 2023

5.0

MABL is a perfectly organized platform for providing effective solution of automated testing. I'm using the software to take advantage of their AI Algorithm to produce better results in your testing and development process.

Pros

MABL is very easy to use and you can easily integrate other tools with the software. They provides many features to speed-up your development process and improves testing quality.

Cons

It's quite expensive compared to other software and needs to improve their customer support. Overall, It's Great Software to use without any doubt.

Review Source

JB

John B.  
Entrepreneur  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Preeminent ML-driven test automation solution"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Saves a lot of time as well as not having to have a developer spend countless hours every week doing the drudgery work which mabl takes care of for us.

Pros

Easiest end-to-end machine learning driven test automation solution available which got us up and running on all of our apps. We just love getting the daily and informative emails keeping us all up to date on any new findings. Just an awesome app and I highly recommend anyone and everyone to quickly install mabl and let mabl run it's magic for your apps.

Cons

The only con we have seen so far is that the reported bad links includes a small subset of links that are not currently relevant, i.e. the links were valid at one time, but are not currently valid. But the report picks them up as broken which they are so it would be great if such links could easily be masked until they are re-used at some point in the future.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Jr DevOps & Infrastructure Engineer  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Mabl is a very innovative idea and it makes testing not stink"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

Personally, I hate writing test automation and this makes it way easier. Tests no longer become brittle over time and Mabl adapts to changing UIs. It's also super easy to implement into your CI/CD pipeline.

Cons

Initially I struggled with getting it to test web apps behind corporate firewalls but this was fixed when I could whitelist the Mabl IP addresses. The UI takes a bit of getting used to as well in terms of navigation.

Review Source

MC

Mike C.  
QA Engineering Manager  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "mabl has been solid for me in the brief time that I've used it."

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

One of the ways by which I use mabl is for crawling pages, to look for broken links. mabl does an outstanding job of doing that, as well as reporting what it finds. I also like the mabl staff. They are very forthcoming in touching base with their user base to solicit feedback, answer questions, etc. Super responsive as well, which is huge for me, as when I evaluate tools for consideration, no matter how good they may be, if the customer service is bad, it's a deal breaker. You will not have that bad experience with mabl. Very solid documentation as well, which is not always the case with new companies. They are constantly updating it, as things change and/or new features are added.

Cons

I would love to see the ability to schedule runs at selected days, times, etc. Also, what I hope is forthcoming from mabl, is the ability to tunnel into private test environments.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Senior Software Developer  
Utilities  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Set up E2E tests in no time"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

Business user friendly interface and low barrier of entry. Easy integration into CI process. The monitoring capabilities are detailed and easy to understand.

Cons

I'd like to have more options on asserting conditions during a test. Other than that, I have have nothing much to complain.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Engineer  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "A powerful test tool that is continuing to improve and become increasingly more valuable"

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

I like that a number of tests start running right away when you add a new app. I like the customer service, they are professional, friendly and helpful

Cons

It is time-consuming to set up the tests and often you must run the journeys over and over to see if they will work or not.

Review Source

Dono G.  
Head Of QA  
Banking  
Used the software for: 1-2 years

### "The future of automated front end testing"

May 20, 2019

5.0

Absolutely amazing tool and I personally believe it is the future of automated GUI testing. This tool will save software engineering teams many hours that has previously been spent on maintaining and debugging failing GUI tests.

Pros

So easy to use. Simple record and playback Has the option to go into more advanced assertions Great cross browser support Extremely stable tests The AI approach to adaptive assertions on tests

Cons

Still quite new so some features are not there yet. Otherwise they are faultless for me

Review Source

NP

Nikee P.  
Software Engineer  
  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Overall, my experience has been positive. I recommend this product. "

May 3, 2018

5.0

A rapid automated testing has allowed us to fix issues that were caused during the development of other features of the platform.

Pros

The ability to set up test cases without writing a single line of code is incredible. Their ML approach is the key.

Cons

Haven't found anything to not like as of yet. So far it meets our company's needs, it makes our testing process much quicker and automated.

Review Source

MD

Matthew D.  
Director of QA  
Information Technology and Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "The product has more bugs than its worth, and it takes longer to perform its tests than one of my te"

May 4, 2018

2.0

I want to be clear, I think that this product is on the right track, and is going to be amazing. this tool will free up the testers from the less effective validation of the product by doing that kind of testing, thus freeing up the tester to actually test and see where things break. Ai is the automation direction that we need to go, and mabl will free up money and people to do the jobs that we are needed to do.

Pros

It is easy to set up use, and get running. Apparently I have to be more wordy in this field, why I dont know.

Cons

The problem is that the tool will log its self out and then pass the remaining tests. The chrome pug-in requires a login but then forces the user to log in again to the website in the same browser, after clicking the button in the plug-in. creating tests that would manipulate the data seem easy, with applying some simple coding skills the user is able to create valuable tests. the problem is that mabl cant find the field, button, or part of the page that was selected in the test creation and simply stop running, no error, nothing. Dont get me wrong I think that this tool is going to be amazing, the problem is that it is simply not there yet.

Review Source

KA

Karthik A.  
QA Lead  
  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "Very promising next generation tool for web application testing "

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

The auto-heal feature and the ability of the tool to traverse the entire application without much configuration.

Cons

The ability to modify and design test scripts. The mabl trainer can be little finicky and it is not very easy to delete and modify steps. Mabl trainer can use some improvements to its user interface.

Review Source

dS

david S.  
Director QA  
  
Used the software for: 6-12 months

### "This is a groundbreaking tool with the potential to seriously reduce automation UI maintenance"

May 7, 2018

5.0

Pros

potential to eliminate the need for selenium and other ancient test tools that require high amounts of maintenance

Cons

inability to compare prod vs. dev (or across versions of software) for differences - we desperately need this to complete implementation

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
CTO  
Human Resources  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Didn't work properly for our site, and couldn't figure out why"

May 4, 2018

2.0

If it works as promised in the demo, it can save loads of time for teams too lean for a dedicated QA test writer. Hopefully, the UI of the app is improved over time.

Pros

It was free to try and the demo of automated testing was very promising. It was also extremely easy to set up.

Cons

The promise of automated testing is very seductive, but unfortunately, it didn't work as intended. The user interface was also confusing to navigate.

Review Source

SB

Suraj B.  
Lead Quality Engineer  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Better alternative for Selenium/Cucumber. "

May 3, 2018

3.0

Pros

1\. Didn't break due to minor UI changes 2. Managing journeys, plans and their scheduling was easy 3. IP whitelisting, server authentications were very useful

Cons

1\. Many of the broken links were found. Again, there were no info about response time, request timeout duration, number of attempts made to open the links and status codes received. 2. There is no exclusion list for links which need not be checked for its correctness 3. It didn't identify the model pop-ups on click of a link as it was expecting a page 4. Not enough info on JS error/exceptions

Review Source

SN

Salma N.  
Quality Analyst  
  
Used the software for:

### "Found it a very good testing software having all the basic functionalities covered. price worthy."

May 4, 2018

4.0

Pros

Good and easy to use environment. Have major testing functionalities. Quick feedback and suggestion service.

Cons

I din't find any thing yet which seems least liking about this software. At first when it doesn't support multiple browsers that was the thing which hit me that what if I want to test on multi browser. but now it supports multi browsers too.

Review Source

Tobias M.  
Co-Founder & CTO  
Apparel & Fashion  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Great tool to run tests on-demand or scheduled"

May 5, 2018

4.0

Pros

\- Fresh, new concept - Interesting approach on integrating machine learning - Competitive price - Fantastic customer service

Cons

\- User interface need some improvements to get your way around - Still early stage so some bugs may appear but still a great piece of software

Review Source

Jan N.  
Co-Founder  
Automotive  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "I was not able to make it runnning on our application"

May 3, 2018

2.0

Pros

The idea using AI for testing is great. The GUI is rich and it is constantly envolving . The startup has funds to make product professional.

Cons

Probably does not support ono-english applications. I did not use support on purpose since I expect proactive review of the support and help with the setting.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Quality Assurance Test Engineer  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "I tested Mabl for an hour and used it a few other times after. It has great potential."

May 3, 2018

4.0

Automated testing, daily emails reflecting status of tests, ease of use

Pros

The potential of the software is the most exciting part. You can see that the product will make things easier for customers. The look and feel of Mabl seemed pretty modern which is important because it makes it seem like it has great support.

Cons

There were a few bugs around the product, but I suspect those will be taken care of. Other than that, it was somewhat difficult to work my way around using the product for the first time. This was resolved as the process was explained to me, but it could be easier to understand.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Director Engineering  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "It was interesting product, but currently i didn't found any usecase"

May 3, 2018

4.0

Pros

Way how we can easily automate it, for web applications is good. Right now we don't have a real use

Cons

Initial learning curve more videos can help on reduction of the effort put out for learning how to make use of it

Review Source

Andrei Z.  
Principal Software Engineer  
Financial Services  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Pleasant overall, but unintuitive UX"

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

Set and forget concept when your tests will just run every X hours. Chrome extension to record tests is really good too.

Cons

User interface and experience of the main app are not very intuitive. For this reason, Ghost Inspector seems easier to use.

Review Source

PY

Prashant Y.  
Software tester  
Computer Software  
Used the software for: I used a free trial

### "Very good application in fast changing world of testing."

July 16, 2019

4.0

The experience is good, it's the need of the current time.

Pros

No need to maintain ever changing locators, one of the best part of the machine learning based application.

Cons

Less exposure towards writing own code leading to less customisation.

Review Source

PC

Pete C.  
Senior Engineer & Engineering Team Lead  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "We've only run a few simple tests, and mabl has been a pleasure to use."

May 3, 2018

5.0

Pros

The ease of use for non-technical employees. Our QA team member, who is just learning her craft and does not know how to write JavaScript based tests, has been able to jump in and create a few journeys that help show the power and value mabl will bring to our company.

Cons

It is still a young product, and does not have all of teh flexibility and functionality of the more mature options.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Lead Software Engineer  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Helped me to create a valuable testing scenario in a hectic startup culture."

May 3, 2018

4.0

I have already mentioned it before.

Pros

The fact that it is easy to use but still very powerful. Since my main focus is the development of new features - this tool gave a real value when it comes to product quality and that is why I am eager to see how it will improve.

Cons

Some of the functionalities doesn't work and sometimes it breaks for no reason. I am not sure why - but it gets really confusing. The categorization of tests is not so clear at some point.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Software Engineer  
  
Used the software for:

### "I like the overall concept , has great scope and will tremendously reduce human effort for testing."

May 4, 2018

4.0

Pros

That it can train itself and flow of the product can be taught to it. It is easy to use with minimum specifications for links testing.

Cons

It does not work well for drop downs. It somehow goes through the flow wrongly even when I specificed the steps.

Review Source

VR

Verified Reviewer  
Manager  
  
Used the software for: Less than 6 months

### "Getting better all the time"

May 3, 2018

3.0

Pros

Some solid time savers in here. There could definitely be some work done on the UI to distinction between all the other packagaged automation systems to improve usability and intuitiveness but overall a solid start.

Cons

It has the same or similar features as many of the other packages out there. Let's see some innovation. Let's see some of the stuff we all wish the other packages had.

Review Source

Similar Products

Featured