# BrowserStack Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra > Is BrowserStack the right Automated Testing solution for you? Explore 663 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/162900/BrowserStack/reviews --- BrowserStack 4.6 (663) [View alternatives](https://www.capterra.com/p/162900/BrowserStack/alternatives/) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated April 1st, 2026 # Reviews of BrowserStack Ease of use 4.6 Customer Service 4.4 ## Pros and Cons in Reviews JP Jaimin P Sr. Software EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “It integrates well with our automation framework, supports parallel execution, and helps us catch compatibility issues early. While there are minor concerns around pricing and occasional session delays, the reliability and time savings make it a valuable part of our development workflow.“ February 19, 2026 Aishwarya V Consultant Software TesterInformation Technology and Services, 1,001 - 5,000 employeesUsed the software for: I used a free trial. “Additionally, debugging issues in automated tests can sometimes be less straightforward compared to local environments, and session timeouts or connectivity issues may interrupt longer test executions. While the platform is feature-rich, initial setup and configuration for advanced use cases can have a slight learning curve.“ March 23, 2026 VG Vigneshkumar G Sr Quality Automation Test EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “BrowserStack demonstrated its full suite - AI-driven testing, unified data store, and automation workflows - giving QA leaders a clear picture of capabilities.“ November 24, 2025 RG Raja dinesh G QA Lead and product ownerRetail, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: I used a free trial. “Additionally, BrowserStack does not currently provide dedicated tools for performance testing or security testing, which leaves gaps for teams looking for an all-in-one testing platform.“ November 26, 2025 NP Neha P Application SupportInformation Technology and Services, 5,001 - 10,000 employeesUsed the software for: 6-12 months. “I liked most about BrowserStack is its real device testing capability, which allows you to test applications on actual browsers and devices without maintaining your own infrastructure.“ March 28, 2026 DK Dharmender K QA EngineerInformation Technology and Services, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “Not able to automate dynamic scenarios using the LCA, Percy is also having issues while capturing screenshots of the Animations on the page .“ October 1, 2025 SB Shelly B Quality Analyst, Business AnalystComputer Software, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “App Live is invaluable, allowing for manual testing across a broad range of real devices and browsers, helping us to uncover device-specific or browser-specific issues we would not be able to reproduce in-house. “ November 17, 2025 AY Amrut Y Test LeadBanking, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: I used a free trial. “Latency: During "Live" (manual) testing, there is occasionally noticeable input lag, especially when interacting with complex animations or heavy web apps on older mobile devices.“ November 25, 2025 ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 1-25 of 663 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use Amar P. QA Lead Computer Software Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing with Great Coverage" March 24, 2026 5.0 Overall, BrowserStack has significantly improved our QA workflow by reducing testing time and increasing coverage. It’s a dependable tool for ensuring consistent user experience across platforms. Despite the cost, the value it provides makes it worth the investment for teams that prioritize quality. Pros BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing incredibly easy. The wide range of real devices and browsers available on demand is a huge advantage, especially when compared to maintaining an in-house device lab. The interface is intuitive, and setting up tests (both manual and automated) is straightforward. Integration with tools like Selenium, Cypress, and CI/CD pipelines works smoothly. Cons The pricing can be a bit high for smaller teams or startups. Also, performance can occasionally lag when using certain real devices, especially during peak hours. Review Source AA Abin A. Automation Engineer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" March 24, 2026 4.0 Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. Pros What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. Cons One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. Switched from [Jira](https://www.capterra.com/p/19319/JIRA/) I switched from Jira to BrowserStack because it provides a more integrated approach to testing. Instead of managing test cases separately, BrowserStack combines test execution, device access, and test management in one platform, making the workflow more streamlined and efficient for QA activities. Review Source ZJ Zach J. FullStack Engineer Consumer Goods Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Easier to use simulators/emulators" March 23, 2026 1.0 It was a large part of my job just tracking failures on browserstack devices, hounding their support to fix things, and triaging flaky test failures that stemmed from excessively variable device states. It is not worth it to use this provider for automated testing for this reason alone. Use simulators and emulators. They are sufficient for catching 99.99% of issues. Pros It had a decent availability of Android and iOS mobile devices and OS versions, including new OS versions. That's about it. Cons Issue resolution, support, lots of downtime and issues that would cause test failures - all resulting in really poor usage as an automated testing device provider Review Source AB Arfa B. Senior software QA Apparel & Fashion Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Reliable and Efficient Testing Platform with Minor Drawbacks" March 26, 2026 5.0 My overall experience with BrowserStack has been positive. It provides a reliable platform for cross-browser and real device testing, making it easier to identify and fix issues across different environments. The interface is user-friendly, and it helps speed up testing cycles significantly. While there are occasional performance lags and the pricing can be a concern, the overall value it delivers in terms of efficiency and test coverage makes it a strong tool for QA teams Pros its extensive real device and browser coverage, which makes cross-browser testing seamless and reliable. The ease of use and quick setup allow teams to start testing without heavy configuration. It significantly speeds up testing cycles and helps identify issues early, improving overall product quality Cons its pricing, which can be quite high for smaller teams. Additionally, automation setup and debugging can be a bit complex, and session timeouts or flaky connections sometimes impact the overall testing experience. Switched from [Sauce Labs](https://www.capterra.com/p/149089/Sauce-Labs/) test execution—especially on real devices—can sometimes be slow. Setting up and maintaining automation requires effort, and debugging failures isn’t always straightforward due to limited log clarity. Additionally, occasional session instability and flaky tests can affect test reliability and overall efficiency. Review Source AR Arthi R. QA Accounting Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "User-Friendly Platform, Yet Customer Support Needs Improvement" March 24, 2026 4.0 Overall, my experience has been positive so far. I’m still getting familiar with the application, but the learning curve has been manageable. It would be beneficial to have more integrations with other tools and platforms, as this would further enhance usability and workflow efficiency. Pros The UI of BrowserStack is clean, intuitive, and easy to navigate. Most of the frequently used features—like device selection, browser choices, and test session controls—are clearly visible and well‑organized. The overall usability is smooth, and switching back and forth between devices or test sessions feels seamless. The platform offers straightforward access to essential tools such as logs, screenshots, and videos, making debugging much faster. Overall, the interface supports a very user‑friendly testing experience with minimal learning curve. Cons The response I received from \[sensitive content hidden\] came across as quite rude. It gave me the impression that BrowserStack may not be fully prepared to assist customers who have doubts or questions. If new customers are addressed in this manner, it raises concerns about the level of support provided to existing customers as well. Switched from [TestRail](https://www.capterra.com/p/128204/TestRail/) Management decision. This was not decided by me or my team, rather this request came from management. Review Source DS Daniel S. Director of Research and Development Hospital & Health Care Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Good But Fix Billing Sync Issues" March 23, 2026 4.0 Overall, it has been good. It is a reliable service (other than the scary automated billing messaged I mentioned above). Pros I really like that when a failure happens, we're able to see a playback video of everything that happened up to the point of the failure. That kind of visual context makes us confident of the reproduction steps. Cons We have had some issues with billing. There have been automated messages that we receive which sound like we are going to have our services cutoff despite our payment being in transit. I wish that paying would be more straight forward so that we wouldn't feel like we are panicking everytime we want to renew. Alternatives considered [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.com/p/170732/LambdaTest/) Reason for choosing BrowserStack Lambdatest did not guarantee that a job would start the moment we launched it. We were left stuck in a 'waiting queue'. Review Source OG Oleksiy G. Manager, Ad Platform Services Marketing and Advertising Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Def worth the money, some things could be better!" March 23, 2026 4.0 Overall, the experience is rather positive and the tool is very helpful especially for mobile tests. It helps to bypass bot-traffic blocks, providing a reliable testing environment compared to emulators. Pros I use BrowserStack to test sites, HTML5 creatives, and other things related to HTML behavior on devices. I like that there are so many different devices to choose from, as well as a variety of browsers and browser versions available. It's super helpful and all of that works well with VPN too. The initial account setup was very easy, and we had an account manager to assist us. Cons The network console is often buggy and does not capture network events sometimes. The console would also oftentimes get disconnected, which means that you have to re-start the device. Alternatives considered [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.com/p/170732/LambdaTest/) Reason for choosing BrowserStack Less devices, less browser options. Also even worse with browser console! Review Source aP adam P. developer Computer Software Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Powerful Cross‑Browser Testing Platform with Room to Improve on Cost and Test Management" March 24, 2026 4.0 Overall, BrowserStack is a reliable and powerful testing platform that excels at cross‑browser and cross‑device validation. It’s particularly well‑suited for teams that prioritize quality, automation, and realistic user environments. While cost and test management limitations are worth considering, the productivity and coverage benefits often outweigh those drawbacks for growing or enterprise‑level teams. Pros Extensive coverage of real browsers and devices Strong automation and CI/CD integration Easy onboarding for manual testers High‑quality debugging artifacts (videos, logs, screenshots) Reduces infrastructure and maintenance burden Cons Pricing can become expensive as team size and parallel usage grow Limited built‑in test management features Occasional flakiness in automated tests due to remote execution Advanced configurations are not always well‑documented Alternatives considered [UserWay Accessibility Widget](https://www.capterra.com/p/218549/UserWay/) Reason for choosing BrowserStack stronger accessibility testing was needed and browser stack had the best product Review Source AH Albert H. Sr Engineering Manager E-Learning Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Comprehensive Solution for Testing on Real Devices" March 24, 2026 4.0 BrowserStack solves my problem of testing our application on real devices and running automated tests. Pros What I like most about BrowserStack is that it uses real devices, not simulated ones, and especially the mobile suite. I also like that it can be integrated with APIs. Cons It's difficult to predict the quota you need for parallelisations. It would be great to have a tool to estimate it. Alternatives considered [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.com/p/170732/LambdaTest/) Reason for choosing BrowserStack The feature set is more complete than in the competitors offering. Review Source Dr. Ibrahim A. CEO Animation Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Incredibly Efficient for Technical Users but Could be Intimidating for Others" March 23, 2026 5.0 I think BrowserStack solves manual testing and helps with automation. The AI tools and Python libraries make it easier to implement scripts for testing websites, identifying issues in fonts and code, or the backend, which I find very beneficial. Pros I like BrowserStack for its amazing tools, especially the AI tools and automation features that make it easier for me to implement scripts for testing multiple things on the website I develop. This helps in understanding any issues with the font, code, or back end efficiently. I think the automation feature stands out the most. It's great for loading and running scripts, which saves a lot of time. Also, I appreciate that BrowserStack works well as a standalone tool, without needing additional companion software. Cons I think the main thing that could be improved, in my honest opinion, is the user interface. I think it needs a bit of improvement. Also, I think if BrowserStack was an app on Windows, Linux, and Mac OS, it would be better than having it on the browser. Because sometimes the browser crashes and causes errors. Review Source SG Shubham G. Software developer Computer Software Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great Tool for Mobile Automation Testing" October 15, 2025 5.0 We use BrowserStack to do automated testing of our Android App in conjunction with Espresso and Android Instrumentation test framework. We have quite a complex app and a lot of automated tests around it that we run on every PR with a Jenkins integration. The overall setup has been quite helpful for us to catch any bugs on the Github PR itself and has helped greatly in increasing our app stability and stopped us from shipping critical bugs on a lot of occasions. The overall experience of setup and running BrowserStack has been quite easy for us. Pros I would say the ease of initial setup, Jenkins and Github Actions integrations and the ability to quickly debug different test logs in case of failures by looking at the videos for the test runs. Cons Once every few months, we do run into false failures due to a bad state on the device but generally it gets addressed quite quickly. Switched from [AWS Device Farm](https://www.capterra.com/p/234693/AWS-Device-Farm/) We had a clabash setup with device farm which frequently run into one or other issues making our tests highly unreliable Review Source SD Sakshi D. QA Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Platform" August 21, 2025 5.0 Overall, BrowserStack has been a reliable and efficient platform for QA automation and manual testing. It saves a lot of setup effort and ensures wider test coverage. Despite minor delays at times, it has improved my testing workflow and helped deliver better quality releases. Pros BrowserStack makes cross-browser and cross-device testing seamless. I like that it provides access to a wide range of real devices and browsers without needing to maintain a local device lab. The UI is intuitive, test runs are smooth, and integration with CI/CD pipelines is very easy. Cons Sometimes the performance can be a little slow when loading certain devices. Also, the cost can be on the higher side for smaller teams, and occasionally some devices take time to connect. Switched from [Automation Anywhere](https://www.capterra.com/p/124575/Web-Data-Extraction/) Cross brower testing makes Overall, BrowserStack has been a reliable and efficient platform for QA automation and manual testing. It saves a lot of setup effort and ensures wider test coverage. Despite minor delays at times, it has improved my testing workflow and helped deliver better quality releases. Review Source RdG Raja dinesh G. QA Lead and product owner Retail Used the software for: I used a free trial ### "Powerful Capabilities with Clear Room for Growth" November 26, 2025 4.0 BrowserStack delivers a strong, intuitive platform with insightful dashboards, objective testing workflows, and seamless integrations—especially with Jira. Its AI-assisted test management and documentation features add real value, and the event’s discussions around their roadmap were absolutely insightful, helping me understand how their products could address our current challenges. However, some areas still need refinement, including the beta-stage AI Eval feature, low-code mobile automation, and the absence of built-in performance or security testing tools. Even the color-coding based on tags at the event could have been more polished. Despite these gaps, it’s promising to see BrowserStack actively working on enhancements, and I’m genuinely looking forward to exploring more of what their evolving ecosystem has to offer. Pros BrowserStack offers a clean UI and insightful dashboards that come with a small learning curve but quickly become intuitive for teams of any size. Its testing strategy is highly objective, supporting structured test execution across real devices and browsers. Test management becomes more streamlined with BrowserStack’s AI-assisted features, which simplify documentation, test maintenance, and error analysis. Integrations are strong—especially with Jira—making automated reporting seamless and ensuring defects flow directly into existing workflows. Customer support is responsive and reliable, and the platform consistently delivers enterprise-grade stability. Given the breadth of real device coverage, automation capabilities, and integrated toolset, BrowserStack provides solid value for money, especially for teams focused on accuracy, reliability, and end-to-end testing efficiency. Cons The new AI Eval feature (currently in beta) doesn’t yet offer a full picture of how it meaningfully improves over established tools like DeepEval. The low-code mobile automation experience also needs refinement to be more seamless and production-ready. Additionally, BrowserStack does not currently provide dedicated tools for performance testing or security testing, which leaves gaps for teams looking for an all-in-one testing platform. Review Source LT Lilit T. QA Automation Engineer Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "“Powerful, Reliable Platform for Cross-Browser Testing and Automation”" October 20, 2025 5.0 Overall, BrowserStack has been an excellent platform for cross-browser and device testing. It’s user-friendly, supports smooth automation, and offers great documentation and support. Pros I really liked how easy it was to set up tests across multiple browsers and devices. The automation tools integrate well with Selenium and CI/CD, saving a lot of time. Customer support is quick and helpful. Cons Sometimes test sessions take a while to start, and the pricing can be high for smaller teams. It would also help to have more automation minutes in lower plans. Review Source SK Santhoshi K. QA Engineer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Reliable Cross-Browser Testing Platform with Strong Automation Support" October 3, 2025 5.0 BrowserStack has become an essential part of our QA process. It allows me to cover cross-browser and cross-device scenarios that would otherwise be impossible to test in-house. I use it heavily for regression and automation, and it has helped improve our release quality and reduced production issues. The setup was quick, the learning curve was very low, and overall it delivers great value for software testing teams Pros BrowserStack makes it very easy to test my applications across multiple browsers and devices without maintaining any physical setup. In my projects, I use it for both manual and automation testing, and the platform integrates smoothly with tools like Katalon and Selenium. The availability of real devices, different OS versions, and responsive design checks saves a huge amount of time. It also helps me validate my applications in different environments quickly and with confidence. Cons At times, the sessions can be a bit slow when working with heavy pages or graphs. The usage limits also require us to manage test execution carefully. Pricing could be more flexible for smaller teams. Apart from that, the tool works reliably. Review Source CA Chidanand A. Tech Lead Computer Software Used the software for: I used a free trial ### "Streamlined Testing Across Devices, but Pricing Could Be Friendlier" August 21, 2025 5.0 BrowserStack is a reliable and feature-rich solution that significantly enhances the quality assurance process. there are occasional performance lags, especially on older devices, and the pricing can be a bit steep for smaller teams. Device availability during peak hours can also be a challenge. Pros The most impressive aspect of BrowserStack is its ability to provide real-time access to a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need for physical infrastructure. This dramatically simplifies cross-platform testing and ensures that applications behave consistently across environments. Cons the pricing structure may not be ideal for smaller teams or startups—it can get expensive as you scale up with more users or parallel sessions. The BrowserStack Local setup can also be a bit tricky, particularly in complex network environments or behind corporate firewalls. Review Source LH Lucía H. QA automation lead Mental Health Care Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Browserstack review" August 22, 2025 4.0 My overall experience with BrowserStack is good, although I'd like to see improvements compared to my previous comment, as I need to address these issues further down the line. Having clear documentation with videos and diagrams, having support staff who speak Spanish, and a good connection with iOS is important for our department. Pros What I like most about Browserstack is that I can use different devices to automate my testing across the company, giving me flexibility in my testing and work. I also like that we can manually test with real devices without having to keep them in a drawer. Instead, you provide them to us. Cons BrowserStack's documentation for WebDriverIO / TypeScript frameworks is quite sparse. The documentation for connecting to the HTTP tunnel and proxies is scarce. The documentation for connecting mobile devices in automation is scarce. We're missing the connection and the iOS device waiting for what's needed in the automation, and it's giving us errors that I've reported to you but haven't been able to fix yet. In general, explanatory videos should be made on how to correctly apply each of the configurations. I'd also like to add that you should have more people who speak Spanish, so we'd feel more confident contacting support. Review Source SM Subhodip M. QA Lead Industrial Automation Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "BrowserStack: Robust Testing Platform Facing a Few Obstacles" September 23, 2025 5.0 Pros BrowserStack offers an intuitive UI, making it easy for new users to get started with lesser learning curve. Provides secure, isolated testing environments to protect sensitive data. Eliminates the need for maintaining physical device labs, reducing infrastructure costs. Centralized dashboard for managing users, devices, and test sessions. Can do both exploratory as well as automated tests, easy to integrate with ADO. Cons Test management features are not as mature or integrated as dedicated test management platforms such as JIRA. There is no pay-as-you-go plan, and payment options are limited (credit card preferred), which can complicate transactions for some organizations Review Source JP Jaimin P. Sr. Software Engineer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Reliable cross-browser testing that fits seamlessly into modern dev workflows" February 19, 2026 5.0 Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. As a Senior Software Engineer, it has streamlined our cross-browser and cross-device testing process significantly. It integrates well with our automation framework, supports parallel execution, and helps us catch compatibility issues early. While there are minor concerns around pricing and occasional session delays, the reliability and time savings make it a valuable part of our development workflow. Pros What I liked most about BrowserStack is the access to real devices and browsers instantly. As a Senior Software Engineer, being able to run parallel tests across multiple environments without maintaining infrastructure saves a lot of time and keeps our releases smooth and reliable. Cons While BrowserStack is powerful, the pricing can be on the higher side, especially if you need more parallel sessions. Occasionally, session startup can also be a bit slow during peak usage times. Review Source CR Crystal R. Quality Assurance Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Must have for Live Cross-Platform Testing!" March 24, 2026 5.0 BrowserStack's Local Testing and Cross-Platform features help me test web and mobile applications across all devices without owning them. It also supports VPN connections for secure testing. App Automate simplifies app testing with minimal development knowledge required. Customer support is also a pleasure to work with, very friendly and extremely helpful. Overall top notch experience working with BrowserStack! Pros I have used BrowserStack for local testing, which supports web applications on mobile, a feature we're normally limited by. The Cross-Platform testing gives us access to all forms of devices without needing to own them individually, and rather than relying solely on virtual devices. I find the App Automate feature allows us to test our applications smoothly, even if we have little to no development knowledge. Additionally, the initial setup of BrowserStack was very intuitive for me. Cons The only issue I've had with BrowserStack is on iOS devices, where access to settings is restricted. It's needed to adjust some settings for testing. Review Source Sourabh G. Automation Lead Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Best tool to adopt for e2e automation" August 21, 2025 4.0 Overall experience was awesome, curious to participate in the upcoming event. Whatever saw I event it has all learning curve Pros I really like the product that BrowserStack has developed for e2e automation, where test cases are generated based on business requirements. Also able to generate test scripts and we can manually update assertions that cover all testing curve, it seems like the developed product is value for money and it has great security. Cons I was expecting it should have auto auto-healing capability, have different CI/CD supporting capabilities like with Jenkins and GitHub actions. Also, have a better test management folder structure. Review Source AS Ana S. Quality Assurance Developer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Pros and Cons of Browserstack in perspective of a Manual QA tester" September 22, 2025 4.0 I will still continue using Browserstack because it helps me to test our products with variety of device and browsers. Maybe improving the items on my cons list might help a lot of other users Pros 1\. Availability of different devices with accurate representation on how the app and sites will behave on each devices 2. It is user-friendly, even if you are new to the site, you can easily navigate how and where to. Plus point also for the seamless switching of browser/devices 3. Having access to the dev tools for easy debugging of the sites/apps 4. Uploading of different version of APKs that they retain is very helpful for the QAs especially if they want to reuse the previously uploaded version Cons 1\. Short idle time for the app live devices. If possible, can this be extended up to 1 hour? Because there are some scenarios that needed this kind of idle time 2. When the device ends their session, the app setup is not retained and needs to start all over again to set up the app on the device. Being able to retain the app after the session can significantly improve workflow efficiency, and I am able to continue the testing where I left off 3. Limitation on the usage of the camera: when I tried to test a video call feature on our app, the device just displayed a black screen. Enabling the camera will also a great feature of using the simulators, if this is possible. Review Source TSV Tamil Selvan V. Senior Software Developement Engineer Media Production Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Usage and Accessing Browserstack from Product side." September 22, 2025 5.0 i have around 8 years of experice with Browserstack. its good but not great in the accesing logs wise. other than everything is great their suppor is exceptional. we got the response very fast if we raise any issues from our side. thoan you so much for that Pros Accessing the carious devices and browsers very easily wherever we want. User interface and working with the real devices are execllent. and automation perspective using parellel runs able to access the multiple devices at a same time and reduces our exection time drastically. Cons Accessing real time logs and backend validations of some of our api against apps in Browserstack is very tedious. please be work and improve on that side for better logs accessing. espicially mobile devices like android and iOS Review Source SM Shreyas M. Director Computer Software Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Browserstack a live device testing hub" September 29, 2025 5.0 We use it to test most of the products and projects we work with. My testing team find it easy, effective but but expensive however value for money when comes to live device testing Pros Multiple devices, live device testing and security is the thing which I like the most . Testing multiple devices live is not cost effective but browserstack make it easy for me and saves Cons Sorry but a bit expensive thing but my team is enjoyed it and finding it value for money so I am not focusing on that part much Switched from [TestMu AI](https://www.capterra.com/p/170732/LambdaTest/) Poor performance it was and team complaint Review Source SA Suhail A. Software Enghineer Financial Services Used the software for: 1-2 years ### "Effective tool for testing" December 15, 2025 4.0 Pros What I liked most about BrowserStack was its reliable and comprehensive cross-browser testing infrastructure. It made it easy to test across a wide range of real devices and browsers without setup overhead, which significantly improved testing speed and confidence in releases. The platform’s stability, fast session startup, and responsive support also stood out, making it a dependable tool for day-to-day QA and developer workflows. Cons The pricing can feel high for smaller teams, and some advanced features have a learning curve that requires additional onboarding time. Review Source Similar Products Featured