# WebLOAD Reviews 2026. Verified Reviews, Pros & Cons | Capterra > Is WebLOAD the right Performance Testing solution for you? Explore 9 verified user reviews from people in industries like yours to make a confident choice. Source: https://www.capterra.com/p/138288/WebLOAD/reviews --- WebLOAD 4.2 (9) Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team. [Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) * * * Last updated March 13th, 2026 # Reviews of WebLOAD Ease of use 4.3 Customer Service 4.7 ## Showing most helpful reviews Showing 1-9 of 9 Reviews Sort by: Most Helpful Rating Company Size Reviewer's Role Length of Use Frequency of Use VR Verified Reviewer Software Test Engineer Computer Software Used the software for: 6-12 months ### "Powerful tool for testing load" May 19, 2019 3.0 Pros 1) it is really helpful for testing the performance of the application by putting the load on application via this tool. 2) it builds the load In very efficient and easy way. 3) it supports many technologies like selenium to mobile. 4) it has play and record functionality which helps to capture results. Cons I am happy to use it. I had great reporting features also. So I don’t have any dislikes for this software. Review Source MC Matthew C. Distributed Data Engineer Retail Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great Overall Product that fit for our business" February 20, 2024 4.0 The easy scripting and open nature of the load testing framework makes WebLoad a great tool in the toolboxes of any test engineers. Pros The JS with custom functions were easy to write scripts in and fast to implement. The vUser parameters and use of the load generators were straight forward to implement the behaviors we wish to replicate as well. Cons Sometimes the agent that manages the remote load testing execution was unstable, so we had to implement some restart actions prior to running our load tests. It wasn't a critical problem, but was a simple solution we added to our load testing process. Switched from [OpenText Core Performance Engineering](https://www.capterra.com/p/200370/LoadRunner-Cloud/) The expensive complex infrastructure from HP wasn't necessary and also their scripting framework was outdated when compared to the simplicity of using JavaScript. Review Source AT Alex T. Automation Computer Software Used the software for: 2+ years ### "WebLoad user for 19 years" February 14, 2024 4.0 The fact that i use it already 19 years, prefering it over other competitors Pros It do the job that i required: load and performancge testing. Helpful support. Relatively not expensive. Cons The IDE performance of some features require improvement Switched from [Apache JMeter](https://www.capterra.com/p/234671/Apache-JMeter/) It is more userfiendly and with active Support Review Source VR Verified Reviewer It systems analysis Education Management Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Webload for vetting performance " July 12, 2024 4.0 Pros Ability to hit DV hard in small intervals Cons Sometimes differences in results that can be difficult to explain Review Source MN MAGNUS N. Performance Engineer Gambling & Casinos Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Overall possitive" February 14, 2024 4.0 I think the tool is powerfull. Rather easy to use if you are experienced. Really helpfull suport, when needed Pros Easy to administrate Not that many bugs Cons Sometimes it's a but sensitive in realtime sitiuations (console) You sort of learn what you can and can't do. i.e when you click around to much in an ongoing test the console sometimes freeze or at worse crash. Reason for choosing WebLOAD I dont know that, it was the time before I started Review Source VA Vimalraj A. Senior Consultant Information Technology and Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Webload very good for Scripting, Running Load tests and Reporting. Very ease of use" February 20, 2024 5.0 Pros IDE is very simple to use, and the Help file content was very useful. Very easy to handle Webload Console and Analytics graphs will be easier for the clients to understand. Cons No proper documentation to install the tool in Microsoft Azure or AWS cloud. Alternatives considered [OpenText Core Performance Engineering](https://www.capterra.com/p/200370/LoadRunner-Cloud/) Review Source KA Keren A. CEO Astea IFS Environmental Services Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Very Possitive" February 14, 2024 5.0 Very good. We keep using this product for a long time already. Pros Easy to use. Easy to write the scipts. Good support service. Cons In some cases we had to wait for new Add-ins to be developed to support our product Review Source VR Verified Reviewer QA Engineer Information Technology and Services Used the software for: Less than 6 months ### "Good performance testing tool" February 15, 2023 4.0 Pros One of the standout features of WebLOAD is its ability to simulate realistic user scenarios. The tool allows developers and QA's to create complex user scenarios that mimic real-world usage patterns, which can be invaluable for identifying performance issues and bottlenecks in web applications. Additionally, WebLOAD allows developers and QA's to test the applications across a range of different platforms, including desktop and mobile devices. Cons A limitation of WebLOAD is that it is primarily designed for testing web applications. While it can be used for testing other types of applications, such as APIs or mobile apps, it may not be as effective in these contexts. This can be a problem for organizations that need to test a variety of applications and services. Review Source RF Roberto F. Software Test Analyst Higher Education Used the software for: 2+ years ### "Great experience with WebLoad" February 28, 2024 5.0 Pros The ability to be able to register more than 1000 records with a script is just amazing. Cons Each term, I would have to create a new script that included new terms and new courses. Although I did make some minimal changes (terms and courses) to one script to see if it would work, for best performance, I was recommended to create a new script. Review Source