# Miro vs Evernote Teams: Features and Cost Comparison 2026 | Capterra > Miro vs Evernote Teams: Which collaboration tool is right for you? Dive into our detailed comparison of their features, costs, and user experience to make your decision. Source: https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-154969/Miro-vs-Evernote-Business --- # Miro vs Evernote Teams Features and Cost Comparison Last updated March 14th, 2026 Provider data verified by our Software Research team, and reviews moderated by our Reviews Verification team.[Learn more](https://www.capterra.com/our-story/) Your comparison: MiroEvernote Teams2/4 selected [Miro](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/)[4.7 (1680)](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/reviews/) [Evernote Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/)[4.4 (8252)](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/reviews/) [## Miro](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/)[4.7 (1680)](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/reviews/) [## Evernote Teams](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/)[4.4 (8252)](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/reviews/) Starting Price $10.00/month Starting Price $10.00/month Value-for-Money 4.4 Functionality 4.6 Ease of Use 4.5 Customer Service 4.3 Starting Price $7.99/month Starting Price $7.99/month Value-for-Money 4.3 Functionality 4.4 Ease of Use 4.4 Customer Service 4.2 Reviews Sentiment Based on [1,680 reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/reviews/) Positive 1,627 Neutral 48 Negative 5 Positive 1,627 Neutral 48 Negative 5 Reviews Sentiment Based on [8,252 reviews](https://www.capterra.com/p/154969/Evernote-Business/reviews/) Positive 7,308 Neutral 737 Negative 207 Positive 7,308 Neutral 737 Negative 207 Best for (according to reviews) - **Business size**: Small businesses account for 64% of reviews (1,053), showing widespread use among this segment compared to enterprises (21%) and midsize firms (14%). - **Industry**: Information technology, computer software, and marketing/advertising together represent 32% of reviews, indicating broad adoption across tech and creative sectors. - **Use cases**: Idea management (48%), collaboration (45%), and whiteboard (36%) are the main uses, highlighting its focus on team creativity and visual planning. Best for (according to reviews) - **Business size**: Small businesses account for 55% of reviews (4,523), reflecting high usage rates among this segment compared to enterprises (14%) and midsize businesses (10%). - **Industry**: Information technology (11%), computer software (10%), and marketing/advertising (7%) collectively represent 28% of reviews, indicating broad adoption across tech and creative sectors. - **Use cases**: Note-taking (64%), task management (45%), and productivity (30%) are the primary uses, highlighting its focus on organization and workflow efficiency. ## Not a match? Find software alternatives tailored to your priorities. These software suggestions are similar to those you’re currently comparing. Highest Rated ### Zoho Projects 4.5 (855) * * * Starting Price $4.00 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 92% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### Smartsheet 4.5 (3,479) * * * Starting Price $12.00 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 92% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### Bitrix24 4.2 (983) * * * Starting Price €61.00 Flat Rate,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 82% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ### Asana 4.5 (13,544) * * * Starting Price $10.99 Per User,Per Month Free Trial Free Version * * * User rating 92% of reviewers rated it above 4 stars * * * ## Reviewer verdict Miro Miro users find it best for real-time collaboration and visual teamwork, appreciating its shared boards, live cursors, and digital whiteboard for brainstorming and project management. Reviewers highlight its effectiveness for remote teams and value its file sharing and customizable task management features, though they mention some navigation and pricing concerns. They say the platform’s integrations and functional free version make it suitable for teams needing interactive, visual collaboration. Evernote Teams Evernote Teams users consider it ideal for organized note-taking, knowledge sharing, and streamlined task management, citing its intuitive interface, shared notebooks, and comprehensive mobile access. Reviewers value its integration with tools like Google Drive and its ability to sync notes and attachments across devices, though they note some syncing and formatting limitations. They find it particularly useful for teams focused on documentation, project coordination, and mobile productivity. ## Connect with a Capterra advisor for a free 15-minute consultation Get a personalized software list aligned to your business needs with guidance from our expert advisors. Our team has helped 1 million+ businesses like yours find options that fit their needs. ## Features comparison In the collaboration market, Miro and Evernote Teams both offer a range of features, and comparing them goes beyond just looking at price. Understanding which functionalities align with your specific requirements can help maximize value and eliminate unnecessary spending. Below is a breakdown of the most critical aspects to consider. \[[1](#source-item-1)\] Key features rated by users Features selected based on 66,023 reviews from Collaboration users. about the Fit Score methodology. Fit Score methodology To calculate the Fit Score, our proprietary methodology factors in the following: - The importance level for each feature. By default, this is determined by user reviews. They can rate a feature Critical, High, Low, or Not Used. - Feedback from real users on how the product performs for each key feature, derived from verified user reviews and ratings. Please note: - To calculate the Fit Score, the number of reviews for those features and the actual rating carry the same weight. You might see that, in some cases, even though the ratings are the same, we still determine a winner because it had more reviews. - If the Fit Score is not shown for a specific product, that only means there are currently not enough relevant data points to develop a meaningful score. It does not indicate that the product should be excluded from further evaluation. Miro 80%Fit Feature ratings Collaboration Tools 4.7 File Sharing 4.3 Task Management 4.3 Mobile Access 4.1 Evernote Teams 81%Fit High performer Feature ratings Collaboration Tools 4.4 File Sharing 4.3 Task Management 4.4 Mobile Access 4.5 Collaboration Tools 4.7 (688) 4.4 (463) Reviewers find Miro's collaboration tools highly effective for real-time teamwork, noting features like shared boards, real-time changes, and visual indicators of team members' actions. They appreciate its ability to facilitate brainstorming, project management, and communication, saying that it is ideal for remote teams. However, some users mention that it may not be suitable for all use cases. Evernote Teams users value its collaboration tools for their intuitive interface and seamless teamwork capabilities, including shared notebooks, comments, and integration with other tools. They find it useful for project coordination and knowledge sharing, though some feel it is not the primary feature. Overall, users think Miro excels in real-time collaboration and visual teamwork, while they value Evernote Teams for its organized and intuitive collaboration features. File Sharing 4.3 (145) 4.3 (374) Miro users appreciate the platform's file sharing capabilities, highlighting the ease of uploading and sharing various file types directly on boards. They value the ability to set permissions and interact with files within the platform. However, some users mention limitations in file type support and occasional syncing issues. Evernote Teams users find its file sharing feature essential for team organization and communication, noting the ability to attach various file types to notes and share them with specified permissions. They appreciate the integration with Google Drive and other tools, though some users find managing access permissions challenging. In summary, users find Miro's file sharing useful for collaborative boards, while they value Evernote Teams for its comprehensive file sharing and integration capabilities. Task Management 4.3 (539) 4.4 (736) Miro users find its task management features helpful for visualizing tasks and project planning, appreciating the customizable boards and templates. They value the collaborative aspects and real-time updates, though some users feel it is not a dedicated task management tool. Evernote Teams users value its task management for its streamlined organization and prioritization, with features like tags, deadlines, and reminders. They find it user-friendly and effective for tracking progress and assigning tasks, though some users experience issues with synchronization and performance. Overall, users think Miro is useful for visual task management and collaboration, while they find Evernote Teams effective for organized and prioritized task management. Mobile Access 4.1 (80) 4.5 (248) Miro users appreciate the ability to access boards on mobile devices, finding it useful for viewing and minor interactions. However, they often prefer using larger screens for detailed work, citing difficulties with navigation and editing on smaller devices. Evernote Teams users value mobile access for its convenience and full functionality, enabling them to manage tasks and notes on the go. They appreciate the synchronization across devices, though some users experience slow syncing. In general, users find Miro's mobile access helpful for quick viewing, while they value Evernote Teams for its comprehensive mobile functionality and ease of use. ## Pricing comparison ### Starting prices Miro $10.00 Per User (Per Month) Free Trial Free Version [View pricing plans](https://www.capterra.com/p/128955/Miro/pricing/) Evernote Teams $7.99 (Per Month) Free Trial Free Version ### Value-for-money analysis 4.4 (1680) 4.3 (8252) Comparing reviews of both Miro and Evernote Teams reveals how users perceive both products' value for money: Miro reviewers say it offers a robust free version with essential features and fair pricing for paid plans, and Evernote Teams reviewers highlight its comprehensive note-taking capabilities and useful free version. Reviewers find Miro's free version to be quite functional, allowing for real-time collaboration and basic project management. They appreciate the fair pricing structure for paid plans, which they say are reasonably priced and offer good value for money. However, some users mention that the free version is limited to three boards and lacks advanced features, which can make it expensive for larger teams or those needing more functionality. As for Evernote Teams, reviewers appreciate its free version for basic note-taking and task management, noting that it includes essential features like voice recognition. They find the paid plans to be relatively costly but acknowledge that they offer additional useful features. Some users feel that the limitations of the free version, such as restricted device syncing and storage, can be a drawback, making the premium plans necessary for more extensive use. ## How does the user experience compare on Miro vs Evernote Teams? ### Overall rating 4.7 (1680) 4.4 (8252) ### User interface Miro Evernote Teams ### Customer service and support Miro Email/Help Desk FAQs/Forum Knowledge Base Phone Support 24/7 (Live rep) Chat Evernote Teams Email/Help Desk FAQs/Forum Knowledge Base Phone Support 24/7 (Live rep) Chat ## What users say about the pros and cons of Miro vs Evernote Teams When it comes to collaboration tools, Miro and Evernote Teams are two options that have been reviewed on Capterra by verified reviewers. Explore the experiences our reviewers have shared about Miro and Evernote Teams to see how they stack up against one another and pick the one that would best fit your needs. Users appreciate Miro for its robust team collaboration features, noting real-time tools like live cursors and commenting that enhance teamwork. They also value its effectiveness in idea brainstorming, highlighting the infinite canvas and visual workspace that facilitate creative sessions. Additionally, reviewers find the digital whiteboard indispensable for remote teams, praising its variety of templates and integration with other tools. Meanwhile, Evernote Teams users commend its note-taking capabilities, citing the ability to organize and enrich notes with images and attachments. They also appreciate the seamless note syncing across devices and the ease of note sharing, which enhances team collaboration. As for the cons, Miro users mention issues with board management, such as slow loading times and cluttered boards. They also find the navigation experience less intuitive and the pricing on the higher side. When it comes to Evernote Teams, reviewers report occasional device synchronization problems and find the pricing steep for smaller teams. Additionally, they note limitations in design and formatting options, which can hinder customization and user experience. \[[2](#source-item-2)\] Pros Miro OR Orest R Sales managerChemicals, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “It does have it’s disadvantages, such as the limit on dashboards and the small number of free templates, but it also has many advantages that make virtual teamwork easier and faster. Once you get the hang of it, it becomes a very useful and even fun tool!“ March 15, 2026 SB Sakshi B Business Intelligence AnalystOil & Energy, 10,001+ employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “Miro supports collaboration with colleagues easily as it allows multiple users to work on the same board at the same time as all the changes are synced in real time in the cloud“ August 26, 2025 Evernote Teams AD Ayman D Senior research fellowResearch, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “Evernote Teams helps me take voice notes, scan receipts and articles and write notes and ideas in a single spot.“ June 17, 2025 WB Wesley M. B Digital Communications DirectorNon-Profit Organization Management, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “I particularly love the tagging feature and shared notebooks even though we’re a small team it makes it a walk in the park to keep everything in sync, even when remote.“ April 29, 2025 Cons Miro MB Matt B Senior Application Solution AnalystNon-Profit Organization Management, 51 - 200 employeesUsed the software for: 1-2 years. “The main downsides are that structured diagrams don’t export in a useful hierarchy, overlapping items can be painful to work with because of the layers, and it would be better if you could add more detail to items without cluttering the board.“ January 4, 2026 Nicole G Senior Insurance AgentInsurance, Self-employedUsed the software for: Less than 6 months. “It could get laggy with lots of users on the file, sometimes we would have trouble locating specific parts of the project because there were too many details in one screen.“ March 16, 2026 Evernote Teams MG Mohammad G General ManagerHigher Education, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “Sometimes when I add notes I noticed the search function misses them, only until you refresh it manually.“ June 9, 2025 YC Yujin C Real Estate Law ClerkLegal Services, 11 - 50 employeesUsed the software for: More than 2 years. “While generally reliable, I have encountered occasional errors, such as double typing issues or content not saving properly when working on very long notes.“ September 19, 2025 * * * Sources 1. Our research team identified features from vendor websites based on their analysis of what users find valuable or expect from collaboration software. This list is not exhaustive. For additional features, refer to the vendor’s website. 2. Review excerpts are passages extracted from longer reviews written by verified reviewers. We obtain these excerpts by applying an algorithm that considers factors including, but not limited to, length, topic coverage, and thematic relevance. Excerpts are evaluated for positive or negative sentiment and receive a sentiment score. They represent user opinion and do not represent the views of, nor constitute, an endorsement by Capterra or its affiliates. Excerpts are not edited for clarity or grammar. * * * Need Help Deciding Between Miro and Evernote Teams? Talk to a Capterra advisor for free and get results within 15 minutes. Popular comparisons - [Miro vs Google Workspace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-247901/Miro-vs-Google-Workspace) - [Miro vs Slack](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-135003/Miro-vs-Slack) - [Miro vs Zoom Workplace](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-144037/Miro-vs-Zoom-Video-Conferencing) - [Miro vs Asana](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-184581/Miro-vs-Asana-PM) - [Miro vs Trello](https://www.capterra.com/compare/128955-211559/Miro-vs-Trello) - [Evernote Teams vs Microsoft OneNote](https://www.capterra.com/compare/154969-227211/Evernote-Business-vs-Microsoft-OneNote) - [Evernote Teams vs Notion](https://www.capterra.com/compare/154969-186596/Evernote-Business-vs-Notion) - [Evernote Teams vs monday.com](https://www.capterra.com/compare/147657-154969/monday-com-vs-Evernote-Business) - [Evernote Teams vs Airtable](https://www.capterra.com/compare/146652-154969/Airtable-vs-Evernote-Business) - [Evernote Teams vs Jira](https://www.capterra.com/compare/19319-154969/JIRA-vs-Evernote-Business)